May 2, 2004
 

Open letter to Mr. Andrew Holota, Editor of The Leader (Surrey/N.Delta)

 
Dear Mr. Holota:
 
In an editorial on April 23, 2003 in the Surrey/North Delta Leader, under the title ‘What didn't happen’, you wrote:
"Well, there it is then. Nothing left to do in Iraq but rebuild the country, unify diametrically opposed sects of Muslims, create a democracy instead of a fundamentalist theocracy, convince the Kurds they don’t want their own country, convince Syria to show Hezbollah the door, and make peace between Israel and Palestine." … "If one still believes the anti-American peaceniks and bad-news-is-best television pundits, it'll never happen."
 
When I originally read your article, I could not believe how many distortions, fabrications and false statements could be included in one short editorial. I was tempted to refute all your statements then, but I held back so as not to be accused of being emotional and one sided.  Furthermore, people in the peace movement realized even then that less than one year would be enough to expose the truth.
 
I held onto your editorial hoping after the passing of a year, you would be honest with yourself, your readers and with those whom you attacked unfairly.  But NO, not a single word about the new Vietnam, the loss of human life (American and Iraqi), not a single word about the ramifications of this war and the new realities on the ground.
 
Mr. Holota, your article was totally wrong, misleading and racist.
Wrong, because the U.S. is not rebuilding Iraq nor creating a democracy, Iraq is now closer than ever to a fundamentalist theocracy, thanks to the U.S. Though it is true that “diametrically opposed sects of Muslims” are unified, it is currently only in opposition to the U.S./U.K. occupation.
Misleading, because Syria cannot show Hezbollah the door. Hezbollah is a Lebanese grass roots resistance movement that showed Israel the door; it also has representatives in the Lebanese Parliament.
Racist, because you cannot determine the destiny of any people -- the Kurds will determine their own destiny and NO outside force will stop their quest for self-determination.
 
You continued on with your “political analysis” to inform the ordinary people in Surrey, Delta and beyond (many other community papers published your April 2003 diatribe) by saying that "the Iraq war... should go down in history as the one most notable for what never happened".
 
You did correctly list a few things that did not happen. "The Iraqis didn't use weapons of mass destruction against the coalition forces. Saddam Hussein didn't fire missiles into Israel."  However, these were never the predictions of the peace movement but rather the predictions of the US/UK "intelligence" which has been proven woefully wrong about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction WMD.
You continued your gloating about what "never happened" by stating - "Baghdad did not become a quagmire of urban warfare."  I don’t need to even comment on that prediction.
 
Then you went on a rampage against what you called the CBC-worshipping crowd and informed us "what else won't occur":
"Iraq won't descend into anarchy, despite the best efforts of some of its people to put it there."…"American forces will not occupy the country for ever."
And then you concluded by saying, "To the chagrin of the Chicken Littles, here are some of the key things that did happen….The U.S. is now helping the Iraqis regroup and rebuild, just as promised."  Have you seen Fallujah lately?  
 
Here are some of the things that have actually happened, none of which you correctly predicted or you are now talking about.
 
 
And just to set the record straight:
 
 
 
Mr. Holota:
 
While I was waiting for an editorial from you to admit your ignorance and distortions, I saw your new editorial "HEU Strike Biting the hands that feed" (April 28, 2004).  I realized from what you wrote that you would never admit nor recognize that you were wrong on the U.S. aggression on Iraq. You are serving the hand that feeds you, that is big business and their representatives in Victoria and the U.S.  Both domestically and globally, your editorials are not meant to reflect accuracy but rather to serve a very specific political agenda.
 
It is a cheap shot when you say that the union is "holding sick people hostage" and that the union struggle for better wages and working conditions is "most reprehensible".  It is the government in Victoria who are holding most British Colombians (including sick and poor people) hostages. It is your dishonest positions and motivations that are the most reprehensible.  I leave you to your conscience (if you have any left) and to the intelligence of the public that will decide on your future.
 
 
Hanna Kawas
#68-10515 153rd St., Surrey, B.C., V3R 4H7
604 588 7888
Member, Stopwar.ca www.stopwar.ca  
Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association www.cpavancouver.org